<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<section article="gcl" article_name="Commercial Law" number="22-305" title_number="22" title_name="Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act" subtitle_number="3" subtitle_name="Construction; General; Interpretation">
  <text>An agreement that is otherwise sufficiently definite to be a contract is not invalid because it leaves particulars of performance to be specified by one of the parties. If particulars of performance are to be specified by a party, the following rules apply:</text>
  <level label="1">
    <text>Specification must be made in good faith and within limits set by commercial reasonableness.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="2">
    <text>If a specification materially affects the other party’s performance but is not seasonably made, the other party:</text>
    <level label="A">
      <text>Is excused for any resulting delay in its performance; and</text>
    </level>
    <level label="B">
      <text>May perform, suspend performance, or treat the failure to specify as a breach of contract.</text>
    </level>
  </level>
</section>
