<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<section article="gen" article_name="Environment" number="14-110.1" title_number="14" title_name="Gas and Oil" subtitle_number="1" subtitle_name="In General">
  <level label="a">
    <text>In this section, “water supply” means a source of water used for drinking or other domestic purpose or for agriculture, including livestock.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="b">
    <text>For each permit the Department issues under this subtitle to drill a well for the exploration or production of gas in deep shale deposits, there is a presumptive impact area around the gas well in which it is presumed that contamination of a water supply was caused by the activities of gas exploration or production.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="c">
    <text>The presumptive impact area shall be in effect:</text>
    <level label="1">
      <text>Within a radius of 2,500 feet from the vertical wellbore; and</text>
    </level>
    <level label="2">
      <text>For 365 days after the last event of well drilling, completion, or hydraulic fracturing.</text>
    </level>
  </level>
  <level label="d">
    <text>Within a presumptive impact area established under subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the permittee shall replace, at no expense to an owner of real property in the presumptive impact area, a water supply that is contaminated as a result of the permittee’s drilling or operation of the gas well.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="e">
    <text>A water supply within a presumptive impact area that no longer yields potable water as a result of the drilling or operation of a gas well shall be considered to be replaced adequately by a permittee if the permittee provides for the affected property owner a new or retrofitted well or other alternative water supply that is capable of yielding potable water equal to the volume used or needed by the property owner before the contamination of the water supply.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="f">
    <text>The permittee and the property owner may agree on monetary compensation or other mitigation instead of restoration.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="g">
    <text>The Department may not require a permittee to replace a water supply or compensate a property owner, as provided in this section, if the permittee demonstrates to the Department by a preponderance of the evidence that:</text>
    <level label="1">
      <text>The contamination is not the result of activities relating to the gas well; or</text>
    </level>
    <level label="2">
      <text>The contamination existed before the commencement of activities allowed by the permit and was not worsened by those activities.</text>
    </level>
  </level>
  <level label="h">
    <text>The Department may adopt regulations to implement this section.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="i">
    <text>The presumption of causation established under this section does not apply to contamination of a water supply if:</text>
    <level label="1">
      <text>The permit applicant requests the permission of the property owner to sample and test the water supply before commencement of activities and to provide the property owner with a complete copy of the test results; and</text>
    </level>
    <level label="2">
      <text>The property owner refuses permission.</text>
    </level>
  </level>
  <level label="j">
    <text>This section may not be construed to affect any common law remedies available to a property owner.</text>
  </level>
  <level label="k">
    <level label="1">
      <text>The presumption of causation established under this section shall apply in:</text>
      <level label="i">
        <text>A proceeding for judicial review under § 14–117 of this subtitle;</text>
      </level>
      <level label="ii">
        <text>An action for an injunction under § 14–118 of this subtitle; or</text>
      </level>
      <level label="iii">
        <text>A civil action for damages or equitable relief brought by a property owner against a permittee.</text>
      </level>
    </level>
    <level label="2">
      <text>The presumption may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.</text>
    </level>
  </level>
</section>
