<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<chapter num="13" heading="Maryland Medicaid Managed Care Program: Independent Review Organization (IRO)" title_num="10" subtitle_num="67">
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".01" heading="Scope and Purpose.">
    <text>This chapter provides for a complaint resolution process for disputes between managed care organizations (MCOs) and providers regarding adverse medical necessity decision made by MCOs. Pursuant to this chapter, providers that receive an adverse medical necessity decision on claims for reimbursement may submit the adverse decision for review by an Independent Review Organization (IRO) designated by the Department.</text>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".02" heading="Definitions.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>In this chapter, the following terms have the meanings indicated.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>Terms Defined.</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>“Adverse decision” means a review determination by a managed care organization that a health care service for which a provider seeks reimbursement is not medically necessary.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>“Affiliate” means a person who, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>“Case record” means documentation submitted to an independent review organization consisting of:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>A claim and only the supporting documentation, including medical records, originally submitted to a managed care organization by a provider prior to the managed care organization’s adverse decision on the claim;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>The managed care organization’s adverse decision; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(c)">
          <text>The managed care organization’s written rationale for the adverse decision.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(4)">
        <text>“Claim” means a clean claim as defined in COMAR 31.10.11.02.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(5)">
        <text>“Complaint” means an appeal of an adverse decision filed with the independent review organization.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(6)">
        <text>“Department” means the Maryland Department of Health.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(7)">
        <text>“Expert reviewer” means a physician or other appropriate health care provider who contracts with the independent review organization to conduct a review of a managed care organization’s adverse decision.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(8)">
        <text>“Health care service” means a health or medical care procedure or service rendered by a provider including:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>Testing, diagnosis, or treatment of a human disease or dysfunction;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>Dispensing of drugs, medical devices, medical appliances, or medical goods for the treatment of a human disease or dysfunction; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(c)">
          <text>Any other care, service, or treatment of disease or injury, the correction of defects, or the maintenance of the physical and mental well-being of human beings.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(9)">
        <text>“Independent review organization” means an entity that contracts with the Department to conduct independent review of managed care organizations’ adverse decisions.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(10)">
        <text>“Managed care organization (MCO)” has the meaning stated in Health-General Article, §15-101, Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(11)">
        <text>“Medicaid” means the program administered by the State under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, which provides comprehensive medical and other health-related care for persons.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(12)">
        <text>“Medical record” has the meaning stated in Health-General Article, §4-301, Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(13)">
        <text>“Medically necessary” means a health care service that is:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>Directly related to diagnostic, preventive, curative, palliative, rehabilitative, or ameliorative treatment of an illness, injury, disability, or health condition;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>Consistent with currently accepted standards of good medical practice;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(c)">
          <text>The most cost-efficient service that can be provided without sacrificing effectiveness or access to care; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(d)">
          <text>Not primarily for the convenience of the consumer, the consumer's family, or the provider.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(14)">
        <text>“Provider” means any individual or entity that has a valid provider agreement with a Medicaid managed care organization or is a nonparticipating provider rendering covered Medicaid services to the managed care organization’s enrollees.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".03" heading="Use of Independent Review Organizations.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>The Department shall procure the services of an IRO to make determinations of medical necessity on provider complaints regarding adverse decisions.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>An IRO that contracts with the Department shall assure, in accordance with its contract with the Department, the:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Timeliness and quality of the reviews;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Qualifications and independence of the IRO and expert reviewers; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>Confidentiality of medical records and review materials, consistent with federal and State laws.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="C.">
      <text>An IRO designated by the Department shall have the authority to conduct the following functions:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Obtaining all case information relative to the complaint from the MCO pursuant to time frames established by the Department;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Assigning an expert reviewer for review of an adverse decision;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>Performing conflicts checks relative to the independent review organization and the expert reviewer assigned to review the adverse decision;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(4)">
        <text>Communicating procedural rules, as approved by the Department, and other information regarding appeals to the parties;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(5)">
        <text>Rendering a timely final decision in accordance with Regulation .06F of this chapter.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".04" heading="Conflicts of Interest Standards for Independent Review Organizations and Expert Reviewers.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>An IRO or expert reviewer may not be an affiliate or have a financial, familial or professional relationship with any facility, provider, or organization that has filed a complaint.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>Upon request by the Department, the IRO shall provide to the Department information demonstrating compliance with the requirement in §A of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".05" heading="Assignment of an Expert Reviewer.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>The IRO shall ensure that an expert reviewer:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Has appropriate clinical expertise in the treatment of the specific medical condition being reviewed and holds a nonrestricted license as a health care provider in the United States; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Has no history of disciplinary investigations, actions, or sanctions, including loss of staff privileges or participation restrictions that have been taken or are pending by any hospital, governmental agency or unit, or regulatory body.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>Upon request by the Department, the independent review organization shall provide to the Department information demonstrating compliance with the requirements in §A of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".06" heading="Independent Review.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>A provider shall exhaust an MCO’s provider appeal process before filing a complaint with the IRO.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>A provider shall file a complaint with the IRO in the form provided by the IRO not later than 30 calendar days following the date of an MCO’s adverse decision.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="C.">
      <text>A review of an adverse decision shall be based on the case record.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="D.">
      <text>The IRO shall, after reviewing the case record, issue a final decision as to whether the health care services that are the subject of the complaint were medically necessary.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="E.">
      <text>The final decision shall state in writing the factual bases for the decision of the expert reviewer and reference the criteria and standards on which the expert reviewer's decision was based.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="F.">
      <text>Final decisions shall be rendered within 45 days of submission of the case record, unless the time period is extended by the Department.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".07" heading="Payment of Fees and Sanctions.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>In the event that a provider’s complaint is unsuccessful, the provider is responsible for paying to the IRO the case review charge established by the Department.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>The case review charge established by the Department shall be based on the contract between the Department and the IRO arrived at through a competitive procurement process.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="C.">
      <text>An MCO that is determined by the IRO to have improperly denied, either in whole or in part, a provider’s claim on medical necessity grounds is subject to the following:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Within 60 calendar days of the date of an adverse decision by an IRO, the MCO shall fully reimburse the provider for claims determined to be medically necessary by the IRO, including any interest owed under Health Insurance Article, §15-1005(f), Annotated Code of Maryland; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Within 60 calendar days of the date of invoice by the IRO, the MCO shall reimburse the IRO the case review charge established by the Department.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="D.">
      <text>In the event that the unsuccessful party does not pay the IRO within 60 calendar days of the date of the invoice, the Department shall impose penalties as follows:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>First delinquency: 17 percent of the invoice amount;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Second delinquency: 35 percent of the invoice amount; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>Third delinquency: 50 percent of the invoice amount plus:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>For providers, suspension from using the independent case review services for 1 year; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>For MCOs, any sanction set forth in COMAR 10.67.10.01A(1)—(5), as determined by the Department.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".08" heading="Appeal.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>As a prerequisite for participating in the IRO complaint adjudication process, a provider waives all other administrative and judicial appeal rights and accepts the IRO’s decision as final and binding.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>An MCO that receives an adverse decision from an independent review organization may file an appeal in accordance with COMAR 10.67.10.02.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <annotations>
    <annotation type="Authority">Health-General Article, §§2-104(b) and 15-103(b), Annotated Code of Maryland</annotation>
    <annotation type="History" subtype="Administrative History">Effective date: April 28, 2014 (41:8 Md. R. 471)</annotation>
    <annotation type="History" subtype="Administrative History">Regulation .08B amended effective December 31, 2018 (45:26 Md. R. 1244)</annotation>
    <annotation type="History" subtype="Administrative History">Chapter transferred from COMAR 10.09.86 effective November 1, 2019 (46:22 Md. R. 977)</annotation>
  </annotations>
</chapter>