<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".06" citation="COMAR 11.01.17.06" title_num="11" subtitle_num="01" chapter_num="17" heading="Screening Process.">
  <paragraph num="A.">
    <text>The purpose of screening is to assist the Department in determining the appropriateness, viability, and effectiveness of delivering a public infrastructure asset for which it is responsible using a public-private partnership methodology.</text>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="B.">
    <text>The screening methodology is a means to systematically apply uniform and consistent factors to both internally generated public-private partnership concepts and unsolicited public-private partnership concepts.</text>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="C.">
    <text>The screening process shall be organized in two phases.</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>High-Level Screening Phase.</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Factors to be considered during the high-level screening may include, but are not limited to:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>Ability to meet State transportation, socioeconomic development, workforce, and environmental goals;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>Technical implementation considerations;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(iii)">
          <text>Potential need for coordination with other State agencies, including but not limited to the Maryland Transportation Authority;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(iv)">
          <text>Opportunities to accelerate asset delivery implementation;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(v)">
          <text>Ability to allocate and share risks in a cost effective manner that shall be consistent with State law and in the best interests of the State;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(vi)">
          <text>Opportunities to reduce reliance on public funds or finance, or both;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(vii)">
          <text>Public affordability considerations;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(viii)">
          <text>Potential for increased revenue generation and revenue sharing with the Department; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ix)">
          <text>Potential impact on the workforce, including existing State employees, if any.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>For internally generated public-private partnership concepts, the high level screening shall be conducted based on the Public-Private Partnership Candidate Concept Application and supporting information provided by the internal sponsor.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(c)">
        <text>For unsolicited public-private partnership concepts, the high-level screening shall be conducted based on information provided by the private entity in an unsolicited proposal and any supplementary information available within the Department.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(d)">
        <text>Based on the findings of the high level screening, the Steering Committee may recommend to the Secretary that specific public-private partnership concepts be advanced or not be advanced to the detailed-level screening.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(e)">
        <text>The Secretary’s written approval shall be required to advance or not advance a public-private partnership concept to the detailed-level screening phase.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(f)">
        <text>Within 45 days after receipt of a Public-Private Partnership Candidate Concept Application or an unsolicited proposal, the Steering Committee shall:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>Notify the internal sponsor or private entity that the concept has been advanced or not advanced to detailed-level screening; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>Request additional information from the internal sponsor or private entity.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>Detailed-Level Screening Phase.</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>The detailed-level screening phase shall be more comprehensive than the high-level screening phase.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>In addition to the findings of the high-level screening phase, analyses and documentation during the detailed-level screening phase may include some or all of the following categories:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>Scope, design concepts, and phasing schedules;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>Compliance with federal and State environmental and transportation planning requirements;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(iii)">
          <text>Technical and financial feasibility analyses;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(iv)">
          <text>Evaluation of operations and maintenance requirements;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(v)">
          <text>Asset lifecycle costs and revenue estimates;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(vi)">
          <text>Risk assessment of key asset delivery elements;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(vii)">
          <text>In the event that a public-private partnership delivery method may have a potential impact on the workforce or existing State employees, a preliminary assessment of the potential impact and potential options for mitigating that impact, including the protections allotted to State employees that are in effect at the time that the P3 agreement is approved by the Board of Public Works; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(viii)">
          <text>Other analyses determined to be necessary to determine the appropriateness, viability, and effectiveness of a public-private partnership delivery method.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(c)">
        <text>The types of analyses and resources committed to a detailed-level screening phase will be determined by the Steering Committee and the Secretary, on a case-by-case basis.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(d)">
        <text>Based on the findings of the detailed-level screening, the Steering Committee shall make recommendations to the Secretary as to which public-private partnership concepts should be advanced and which should not be advanced to submission of a pre-solicitation report.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(e)">
        <text>The Secretary’s written approval shall be required to advance or not advance a public-private partnership concept to submission of a pre-solicitation report.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(f)">
        <text>Within 45 days after advancement of a public-private partnership concept to the detailed-level screening analysis phase, the Steering Committee shall:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>Notify the internal sponsor or private entity that the concept is or is not under development for possible submission of a pre-solicitation report; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>Request additional information from the internal sponsor or private entity.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
</regulation>