<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".06" citation="COMAR 13A.01.05.06" title_num="13A" subtitle_num="01" chapter_num="05" heading="Standard of Review.">
  <paragraph num="A.">
    <text>General. Decisions of a local board involving a local policy or a controversy and dispute regarding the rules and regulations of the local board shall be considered prima facie correct, and the State Board may not substitute its judgment for that of the local board unless the decision is arbitrary, unreasonable, or illegal.</text>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="B.">
    <text>A decision may be arbitrary or unreasonable if it is one or more of the following:</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>It is contrary to sound educational policy; or</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>A reasoning mind could not have reasonably reached the conclusion the local board or local superintendent reached.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="C.">
    <text>A decision may be illegal if it is one or more of the following:</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>Unconstitutional;</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>Exceeds the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the local board;</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(3)">
      <text>Misconstrues the law;</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(4)">
      <text>Results from an unlawful procedure;</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(5)">
      <text>Is an abuse of discretionary powers; or</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(6)">
      <text>Is affected by any other error of law.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="D.">
    <text>The appellant shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.</text>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="E.">
    <text>State School Laws and Regulations. The State Board shall exercise its independent judgment on the record before it in the explanation and interpretation of the public school laws and State Board regulations.</text>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="F.">
    <text>Certificated Employee Suspension or Dismissal pursuant to Education Article, §6-202, Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>The standard of review for certificated employee suspension and dismissal actions shall be de novo as defined in §F(2) of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>The State Board shall exercise its independent judgment on the record before it in determining whether to sustain the suspension or dismissal of a certificated employee.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(3)">
      <text>The local board has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(4)">
      <text>The State Board, in its discretion, may modify a penalty.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="G.">
    <text>Student Suspension and Expulsion.</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>The decision of a local board in a student suspension and expulsion matter shall be final pursuant to Education Article, §7-305(c), Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>The State Board may not review the merits of a student suspension or expulsion, but shall accept an appeal if there are specific factual and legal allegations of one or more of the following:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>The local board has not followed State or local law, policies, or procedures;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>The local board has violated the due process rights of the student; or</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(c)">
        <text>The local board has acted in an unconstitutional manner.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(3)">
      <text>The State Board may reverse or modify a student suspension and expulsion if the allegations set forth in §G(2) of this regulation are proven true or if the decision of a local board is otherwise illegal as defined in §C of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(4)">
      <text>The appellant shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
</regulation>