Regulation .06 Criteria for Review of a Proposal for a New Program.
Regulation .06 Criteria for Review of a Proposal for a New Program.LinkCopy Citation
A program proposal for a new program shall address the following areas:
A.
Centrality to mission and planning priorities, relationship to the program emphasis as outlined in the mission statements, and an institutional priority for program development;
B.
Critical and compelling regional or Statewide need as identified in the State Plan;
C.
Quantifiable and reliable evidence and documentation of market supply and demand in the region and service area;
D.
Reasonableness of program duplication, if any;
E.
Relevance to the implementation or maintenance of high-demand programs at HBIs;
F.
Relevance to the support of the uniqueness and institutional identities and missions of HBIs;
G.
Adequacy of curriculum design, program modality, and delivery to related learning outcomes, consistent with Regulation .10 of this chapter;
H.
For public institutions, adequacy of articulation and transfer planning, consistent with Regulation .19 of this chapter;
I.
Adequacy of faculty resources, consistent with Regulation .11 of this chapter;
J.
Adequacy of library resources, consistent with Regulation .12 of this chapter;
K.
Adequacy of physical facilities, infrastructure, and instructional equipment, consistent with Regulation .13 of this chapter;
L.
Adequacy of financial resources with documentation, consistent with Regulation .14 of this chapter;
M.
Adequacy of provisions for evaluation of program, consistent with Regulation .15 of this chapter;
N.
Consistency with the Commission's minority student achievement goals;
O.
Relationship to low productivity programs identified by the Commission; and
P.
Adequacy of distance education programs under Regulation .22 of this chapter.