In this chapter, the following terms have the meanings indicated. Terms Defined. Abatement. “Abatement” means the elimination of the violation; “Abatement” includes stabilization of the site. “Restoration” means returning the affected area to its previous condition prior to the violation. “Violator” means a contractor, property owner, or any other person who committed, assisted, authorized, or participated in the violation. Violation. “Violation” means an act that violates the provisions of this subtitle or Natural Resources Article, Title 8, Subtitle 18, Annotated Code of Maryland. “Violation” includes: Clearing, disturbance of the Buffer, construction of unpermitted structures, grading in the Critical Area without a permit, grading in the Critical Area beyond the allowable limits authorized by a local jurisdiction, and exceedance of allowable lot coverage limits; and Failure to comply with the deadlines required under Regulation .03 of this chapter. Notwithstanding any provision in a local law or ordinance, or the lack of provision in a local law or ordinance, all of the requirements of this regulation shall apply to, and be applied by, a local jurisdiction as minimum standards for a local program sufficient to meet the goals of the Critical Area program. In the event that a provision of this chapter conflicts with a provision of a local program, the stricter provision applies. A local jurisdiction shall include all of the following requirements as part of their enforcement program. A local jurisdiction may obtain access to and enter a property in order to: Identify or verify a suspected violation; Restrain a development activity; or Issue a notice of violation if a local jurisdiction believes that a violation of the local program has occurred or is occurring. A local jurisdiction shall make a reasonable effort to contact a property owner before obtaining access to or entering the property. If a property owner denies entry, a local jurisdiction may seek an injunction to enter the property to pursue an enforcement action. If a local jurisdiction identifies an active violation, it shall issue a stop work order. Within 30 days of identifying a violation or issuing a stop work order, a local jurisdiction shall send the alleged violator, via certified mail, a notice of violation letter that includes: A description of the facts supporting the alleged violation; References to the provisions of Natural Resources Article, Title 8, Subtitle 18, Annotated Code of Maryland, this title, or a local jurisdiction’s Critical Area program which have been alleged to have been violated; A notice of the right to file an appeal in accordance with §J of this regulation; If eligible to apply for a variance, an explanation that applying for a variance constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal the notice of violation; Actions necessary to bring the site into compliance, which may include: Paying fines in accordance with Regulation .04 of this chapter; A description of the abatement and restoration measures required under §H of this regulation to resolve the violation and the deadline by which those measures must be implemented; If the violation is a clearing violation, a requirement that the alleged violator replant trees where the cutting or clearing occurred in accordance with a plan prepared by the State Forester, a licensed professional forester, a licensed landscape architect, or a Forest Conservation Qualified Professional approved by the Department of Natural Resources; A mitigation plan as required under §H of this regulation; and Applying for an after-the-fact variance; and A deadline for when a response action is required from the alleged violator. The local jurisdiction shall: Track the deadlines required in §E of this regulation; Communicate in writing if an alleged violator fails to meet the initial deadline; and Perform one of the following actions if the alleged violator does not resolve the violation as required by the notice of violation, and fails to respond to the local jurisdiction’s written communication for 30 days: Request assistance from the Commission; Refer the matter to the Commission as required under Regulation .05 of this chapter for referral to the Office of the Attorney General; Refer the matter to the local jurisdiction’s Office of Law to bring an enforcement action, including civil penalties; Refer the matter to the Office of the Attorney General for criminal prosecution; or If the violation is for clearing, file suit in circuit court for damages in an amount equal to the estimated cost of replanting trees which shall be paid by the alleged violator to the local jurisdiction. If a local jurisdiction fails to comply with the requirements under §F of this regulation, the Commission may notify the local jurisdiction of the deficiency and take any necessary actions, in accordance with Natural Resources Article, §8-1809(n), Annotated Code of Maryland. The local jurisdiction may require any of the following actions in order to remedy the violation: Abatement; A restoration plan to provide plantings at a mitigation rate in accordance with a local program; and A mitigation plan to provide plantings at the rate required by a local program if the alleged violator pursues an after-the-fact variance. If the alleged violator pursues an after-the-fact variance, mitigation requirements are cumulative and consist of plantings for: The violation in accordance with an approved restoration plan under §H(2) of this regulation; and The variance in accordance with an approved mitigation plan under §H(3) of this regulation. A local jurisdiction shall provide an appeals process consistent with their local program that allows the alleged violator to appeal the notification of violation. These regulations are not intended to alter a local jurisdiction’s authority to assess fines, as provided under the Maryland Constitution or the Express Powers Act. Each alleged violator who violates a provision of a local program shall be subject to separate fines for each offense in accordance with Natural Resources Article, §8-1808(c)(1)(iii)15, Annotated Code of Maryland, including: Each violation constitutes a separate offense; Each calendar day that a violation continues constitutes a separate offense; and, Fines for a continuing violation shall accrue without a requirement for an additional assessment, notice, or opportunity for hearing for each separate offense. In determining the amount of the penalty to be assessed, a local jurisdiction shall consider: The gravity of the violation; Any willfulness or negligence involved in the violation; The environmental impact of the violation; and The cost of restoration of the resources affected by the violation and mitigation for damage to that resource. A jurisdiction shall require a bond or other financial security for restoration or mitigation that exceeds 1,000 square feet or $1,000, or adopt procedures approved by the Commission that ensure the restoration or mitigation is properly completed. At any time during the enforcement process, a local jurisdiction may request, in writing, assistance from the Commission with an enforcement action. A local jurisdiction may request in writing that the Chair refer an enforcement action to the Office of the Attorney General. A local jurisdiction shall require any additional mitigation as a condition of approval for a permit, approval, variance, or special exception be completed within 90 days of issuance of the permit, approval, variance, or special exception unless an extension of time is appropriate because of adverse planting conditions, not to exceed an additional 90 days. A local jurisdiction shall institute a criminal prosecution or suit for a civil penalty for a violation within three years after a Commission or the local jurisdiction knew or reasonably should have known of a violation. Natural Resources Article, §§8-1806, 8-1808(c), 8-1809, 8-1815, and 8-1815.1, Annotated Code of Maryland Effective date: December 11, 2025 (52:24 Md. R. 1199)