<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<chapter num="13" heading="Notice of Premium Increase for Commercial Insurance" title_num="31" subtitle_num="15">
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".01" heading="Scope.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>This chapter applies to:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Commercial insurance as defined in Insurance Article, §27-601(b), Annotated Code of Maryland; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Workers’ compensation insurance for employers’ liability as set forth in Labor and Employment Article, Title 9, Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>This chapter does not apply to policies:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Issued to exempt commercial policyholders, as defined in Insurance Article, §11-206(j), Annotated Code of Maryland;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>For which the renewal premium is:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>In excess of $1,000; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>An increase over the expiring policy premium of the lesser of 3 percent or $300; or</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>Of surplus lines insurance procured from a nonadmitted insurer under Insurance Article, Title 3, Subtitle 3, Annotated Code of Maryland.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".02" heading="Notice Requirement for Commercial Lines Policies.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>Exceptions.</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>The notice required by Insurance Article, §27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland, does not apply to an insurer that intends to increase a premium for a commercial lines policy if the insurer satisfies the Commissioner that it cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirement for any risk, category of risk, or line of business involved.</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>An insurer is deemed unable to reasonably comply with the notice required by Insurance Article, §27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>With respect to any portion of a premium increase that results from:</text>
          <paragraph num="(i)">
            <text>An increase in the units of exposure;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(ii)">
            <text>Application of an experience rating plan;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(iii)">
            <text>Application of a retrospective rating plan;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(iv)">
            <text>A premium audit performed in accordance with the terms of the policy;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(v)">
            <text>Any change made by the insured to the risk that increases insurer's exposure on the risk;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(vi)">
            <text>A request made by the insured to change coverage under the policy; or</text>
          </paragraph>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>If the insurer:</text>
          <paragraph num="(i)">
            <text>Has given notice of its intent not to renew the policy;</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(ii)">
            <text>Is required to hold coverage in effect past the expiration date and into the renewal period, by operation of Insurance Article, §27-501(f), Annotated Code of Maryland; and</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(iii)">
            <text>Does not receive the hold-in-effect directive of the Commissioner far enough in advance of the renewal date to calculate the premium and provide the notice of premium increase at least 45 days before the effective date of the proposed premium increase.</text>
          </paragraph>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>Calculation of Amount of Premium Increase. In determining whether an insurer is required to provide a notice of increase in premium for a commercial lines policy under Insurance Article, §27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland, the insurer shall deduct from the total amount of the premium increase any portion of the premium increase that is exempted from the notice requirement under §A(2)(a) of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="C.">
      <text>Content of Notice.</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>For a commercial lines policy, an insurer shall include on a notice of premium increase required by Insurance Article, §27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland, the following:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>The expiring policy premium and the renewal policy premium; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>The telephone number for the insurer or insurance producer, if any, together with a statement that the insured may call to request additional information about the premium increase.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Notwithstanding §C(1) of this regulation, the insurer shall provide a reasonable estimate of the premium increase or range of the premium increase based on the information available to the insurer at the time that the notice is sent if:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>The insurer's rating methodology requires the insured to provide information to the insurer for the insurer to calculate the premium;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>The insurer requests the information from the insured far enough in advance of the renewal date for:</text>
          <paragraph num="(i)">
            <text>The insured to provide the information to the insurer; and</text>
          </paragraph>
          <paragraph num="(ii)">
            <text>The insurer to calculate the premium and provide the notice of premium increase at least 45 days before the effective date of the proposed premium increase; and</text>
          </paragraph>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(c)">
          <text>The insured fails to provide the information to the insurer far enough in advance of the renewal date for the insurer to calculate the premium and provide the notice of premium increase at least 45 days before the effective date of the proposed premium increase.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".03" heading="Request for Exception.">
    <paragraph num="A.">
      <text>For a situation not expressly exempted by Regulation .02A(2) of this chapter from the notice required by Insurance Article, §27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland, an insurer may apply for an exception to the notice requirement by submitting to the Commissioner at least 60 days before the date the notice is required to be sent:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>A written request for an exception to the notice requirement;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>A written explanation of why the insurer cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirement for any risk, category of risk, or line of business involved; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(3)">
        <text>Any information that supports the insurer's contention that it cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirement.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="B.">
      <text>On receipt of a request for an exception to the notice requirement, the Commissioner shall:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Review the request for an exception to the notice requirement, the explanation of why the insurer cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirement, and any information accompanying the request; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Determine whether the insurer can reasonably comply with the notice requirement for any risk, category of risk, or line of business involved.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="C.">
      <text>If the Commissioner determines that an insurer cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirement for any risk, category of risk, or line of business involved, the Commissioner shall:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Grant the insurer's request for an exception to the notice requirement; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Send to the insurer a notice that:</text>
        <paragraph num="(a)">
          <text>States that the insurer's request for an exception to the notice requirement has been granted;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(b)">
          <text>Identifies the risk, category of risk, or line of business to which the exception applies; and</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(c)">
          <text>States the duration of the exception to the notice requirement.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="D.">
      <text>If the Commissioner determines that an insurer can reasonably comply with the notice requirement, the Commissioner shall:</text>
      <paragraph num="(1)">
        <text>Deny the insurer's request for an exception to the notice requirement; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(2)">
        <text>Send to the insurer a notice that states that the insurer's request for an exception to the notice requirement has been denied.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </regulation>
  <annotations>
    <annotation type="Authority">Insurance Article, §§2-109 and 27-608, Annotated Code of Maryland</annotation>
    <annotation type="History" subtype="Administrative History">Effective date: March 27, 2006 (33:6 Md. R. 580)</annotation>
    <annotation type="History" subtype="Administrative History">Chapter revised effective January 1, 2015 (41:21 Md. R. 1261)</annotation>
  </annotations>
</chapter>