<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".05" citation="COMAR 33.11.05.05" title_num="33" subtitle_num="11" chapter_num="05" heading="Ballot Rejection — Unusual Marking Device.">
  <paragraph num="A.">
    <text>Duplication.</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>Absentee ballots may be marked by any kind of pencil or ink.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>Certain types of pencil or ink, however, might not be readable by optical scanning equipment. Accordingly, ballots not marked with the appropriate pencil or ink should be referred by the local board to the duplication team.</text>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="B.">
    <text>Possible Rejection. In a specific case, the local board may consider the particular pencil or ink used to be unusual enough to be considered an attempt to intentionally identify the ballot.</text>
  </paragraph>
</regulation>