<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<regulation prefix="Regulation" num=".16" citation="COMAR 36.03.02.16" title_num="36" subtitle_num="03" chapter_num="02" heading="Denial of a License.">
  <paragraph num="A.">
    <text>Denial of a Video Lottery Employee, Manufacturer, or Contractor License.</text>
    <paragraph num="(1)">
      <text>In addition to the hearing requirements in §B of this regulation, the following process shall precede a hearing on the denial of a video lottery employee, manufacturer, or contractor license.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(2)">
      <text>After reviewing an application submitted for a video lottery employee, manufacturer, or contractor license, the Director may recommend that the Commission deny the application of an applicant who:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Has not established by clear and convincing evidence that the applicant meets applicable qualifications; or</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>Has violated:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>A provision of State Government Article, Title 9, Subtitle 1A, Annotated Code of Maryland;</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>A regulation adopted pursuant to State Government Article, Title 9, Subtitle 1A, Annotated Code of Maryland; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(iii)">
          <text>A condition set by the Commission.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(3)">
      <text>If the Director recommends that the Commission deny a video lottery employee, manufacturer, or contractor license, the Director, or the Director's designee, shall promptly provide the applicant with written notice of the:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Recommendation for denial;</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>Basis for the recommendation; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(c)">
        <text>Applicant's right to request a reconsideration meeting with the Director or the Director's designee.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(4)">
      <text>An applicant may submit to the Commission a written request for a reconsideration meeting within 15 days of the date of the notice described in §A(3) of this regulation.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(5)">
      <text>If an applicant fails to timely submit a request under §A(4) of this regulation, the Commission may adopt as final the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(6)">
      <text>During a reconsideration meeting, an applicant may:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Be represented by counsel; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>Present evidence as to why the license should be granted;</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(7)">
      <text>If after the reconsideration meeting the applicant is dissatisfied with the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee, the applicant may submit to the Commission, in writing:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>A request for hearing before the Commission on the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>The applicant's legal and factual bases for disagreeing with the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(8)">
      <text>An applicant may submit a hearing request to the Commission within 15 days of the date of the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee after the reconsideration meeting.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(9)">
      <text>If an applicant fails to timely submit a written hearing request under §A(8) of this regulation, the Commission may adopt as final the recommendation of the Director or the Director's designee.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(10)">
      <text>Upon receipt of a timely written hearing request, the Director shall provide the applicant a hearing notice for a hearing before the Commission.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(11)">
      <text>The Director's hearing notice, and the Commission hearing at which the recommended denial will be considered, shall comply with the requirements of COMAR 36.01.02.06.</text>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(12)">
      <text>The Commission shall:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Grant the license after determining that the applicant is qualified; or</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>Deny the license after determining that the applicant:</text>
        <paragraph num="(i)">
          <text>Is not qualified or is disqualified; or</text>
        </paragraph>
        <paragraph num="(ii)">
          <text>Has violated a provision described in §A(2)(b) of this regulation.</text>
        </paragraph>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
    <paragraph num="(13)">
      <text>Following a hearing at which a license is denied, the Commission shall:</text>
      <paragraph num="(a)">
        <text>Prepare an order denying the license with a statement of the reasons and specific findings of fact; and</text>
      </paragraph>
      <paragraph num="(b)">
        <text>Provide the applicant with written notification of its final action.</text>
      </paragraph>
    </paragraph>
  </paragraph>
  <paragraph num="B.">
    <text>The Commission's final action on a license denial is subject to judicial review as provided in State Government Article, Title 10, Subtitle 2, Annotated Code of Maryland</text>
  </paragraph>
</regulation>